Serving Sizes Are So Jacked

Not that I'm counting calories or anything, but the way they tally nutritional information for packages is just dumb. To me, serving size should mean "the size of a (sufficient) serving" - "sufficient" being of an amount that satisfies you. This leads to two complaints against serving sizes:

They are not filling enough - Take pasta, for example. When you go to the restaurant, you get a nice big plate of fettucine alfredo... Mmmmmm! :) You may finish 1/2 of that plate and take the rest home if you're a small eater - That's 2 servings. Now go to the store and pick up a box of pasta... the serving size is 2 ounces... what is that? like 8-10 noodles? Sorry. That's not a sufficient serving. I don't know who could eat 2 ounces of pasta and call it a satisfying meal. I mean, what were they thinking? This is how they trick dieters into counting calories, and it's also the reason why people who count calories are always so fucking hungry!

It doesn't make sense when it comes to the packaging - Remember 12 oz soda cans? They used to be marked as having 1.5 servings in them. That's gross. What? Am I gonna drink my one serving and then give the other 1/2 to my friend? hahaha :P But seriously. The nutrition people know they're gonna fucking drink the whole can. Even a dieter has no real way of telling if there's 1/3 of the soda left in the can to save for the extra 1/2 a serving. And really? Who saves warm soda for later? Yuck. Same with the 20 oz. bottles... they have 2.5 servings! Better find two friends to share with ;)